How big was the iceberg compared to the titanic?

In terms of overall size, the iceberg was about half the size of the Titanic, and the iceberg that sank the Titanic was more than twice the size of the one that doomed the Californian. The iceberg that sunk the Titanic was estimated to be about 374 meters long, or 1,200 feet, while the one that sunk the Californian was about 22 meters long, or 72 feet.

How big was the iceberg compared to the titanic ship?

The iceberg was about the same size as the Titanic. The iceberg was about 30 metres wide and only about 10 metres high. It’s estimated that the iceberg had a surface area of about 150 sq km, making it about the size of Manhattan Island.

How big was the titanic ship compared to the iceberg?

The Titanic had a length of 882 feet and the iceberg was estimated to be around 20 times its size. The iceberg was approximately 300 metres (980 feet) long, 90 metres (295 feet) wide and 35 metres (115 feet) high. The Titanic was about 283 metres (907 feet) long, and was around 17 metres (56 feet) wide and 52 metres (164 feet) high.

How big was the titanic compared to the iceberg size?

The iceberg’s length was estimated at about 75 km (47 miles), or about half the length of the Titanic. That would have been about 20 times longer than the Titanic, which had a length of 1654 feet.

How big was the titanic compared to titanic?

The Titanic was about 11 decks high and could be about 300 meters in length. The iceberg was much smaller, about half that in length. It was only about 6 meters in height. The Titanic’s weight was about 43,000 tons while the iceberg’s weight was estimated at about half of that — about 22,000 tons.