What does rigorous mean in history

What does rigorous mean in history?

To be rigorous means to use the most reliable and up-to-date sources available to you. It means to not take information for granted or assume that someone else already knows the answer to your question. It means to be thorough and to do research. When you take the time to be rigorous, you give yourself the best chance of getting the right answer.

What does rigorous mean in history essay?

The word “ rigorous means strict, exacting, or severe. The same word is also not commonly used outside of the context of history. When someone says something is rigorous, they are usually trying to put down their subject matter as overly academic or overly difficult for the layman to understand. While this is sometimes the case, the meaning of the word “rigorous” can be taken more than one way. In fact, the term’s meaning can vary depending

What is rigorous history?

For historians, rigorous history is a way of doing history that questions what you’ve been taught about the past. It means taking the story apart and trying to find the true story that lies underneath. It means using different sources and methods and being willing to change your mind if new evidence comes to light. It means recognizing that we can’t understand history without the context of the time in which it happened. Finally, rigorous history means that you don’t believe everything you read,

What does rigorous mean in history essay competition?

If you are looking for an answer to “What does rigorous mean in history essay competition?”, you can look at the question mark. The question mark is used in history to indicate a question, so asking what does rigorous mean in history essay competition is actually asking what does a rigorous history essay look like? To answer this question, you need to look at the context of the contest and the type of essays that you will be competing against.

What does rigorous mean in history essay contest?

The rigorous school of history is an approach to history writing in which historians base their conclusions on the weight of evidence and the most sound arguments. They don’t just present any argument that they find interesting or appealing. Instead, they research thoroughly to determine which sources are most reliable and use them to build a compelling argument.